
In "The Loss of Innocence" by James P. Steyer, the argument is made that children are corrupted by television.
In the article "Good news, bad news for tube-watching tots:
When it comes to screen time, experts say content is key" by The Associated Press, the AP claims that there are two primary schools of thought: 1. "The claims vary widely, from proponents who say TV and baby software can help kids learn to criticisms that they steal crucial time once spent playing and reading, or even causes attention disorders." And 2. "The reality: There is little clear data on how TV affects child development at any age, much less before age 2 — and even less research on computers for tots, video games and other now-pervasive electronic media."
Which side does Steyer fall on? What is his point of view? How does he support it? Which side do you fall on? Why?
Remember in this post to make specific references to the Steyer essay. Points will be deducted for those who fail to do so.
The entire "Good News, bad news" article can be found at: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12806594/